The gap in wealth between the richest 10 of humanity

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: rson • Area of virgin tropical forest will decline • Oceanic fishery harvest per person will decline • Fewer plant and animal species will exist • Deaths from AIDS will increase • Sperm counts of human males decline; reproductive disorders will increase. • The gap in wealth between the richest 10% of humanity and the poorest 10% will increase -This resembles key aspects of the Malthusian proposition: p opulations grow faster than resources. As a consequence, resources become more scarce. It seemed it was likely that Erlich would win. Simon DENIED Simon declined to bet on those indicators • Rejected the proposal that those trends were bad for humans • Would have lost bet if he had accepted • What do you think about those trends? • Is Ehrlich a failed prophet, or just premature? • Did Ehrlich warn in vain, or did his warnings have an effect? -Do people lose credibility if they start warning too early? "They've been warning us since the 60's .. nothing has happened yet… therefore they must be wrong" -Did this happen to Erlich? Is there any way to address population that is not morally offensive? • Consider the film Mother: Caring for Seven Million • Proposition: human fertility rates fall when women acquire more legal rights, more education, and access to contraception • Standard of living goes up • No compulsion needed Population issues once dominated public discourse, but no longer—why? • Managing population not popular with either left wing or right wing ideologues – Left: Rich countries telling poor countries to restrict reproduction is morally wrong – Right: Birth control is morally wrong • Most economists push “growth” as essential; even liberal press agrees • It’s more comfortable to ignore things that seem “far in the future,” especially tradeoffs with benefits now, costs later Left: Reluctance in industrialized societies to tell people in developing countries what to do. It is not morally sound to g ive advice to the developing world after we've already u ndergone demographic transition ourselves. - Canadian economic growth is 2-3% per year -Each year, that 2-3% becomes even MORE -Economists push growth as essential : OPPOSITE of natural s ystems 6...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 01/27/2014.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online