Is of the right form if these equations seem obscure

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ditional comment on the negative case for those who are interested: If m > 0 and n < 0, then we know from above that  ­n = qm + r so n = ( ­q)m + (– r). This is the right form but now r is negative or zero. If r = 0, then 0 ≤ r < m and we are done. But if  ­m <  ­r < 0, we add m to r to get 0 < m – r < m. So if we rewrite the equation as n = ( ­q ­1)m + (m– r). So this has the form n = q'm + r, with q' =  ­q ­1 and r' = m ­r. For negative m, it is simpler. If m is negative and so –m is postive, then for any n, n = q( ­m) +r and so n = ( ­q)m + r. is of the right form. If these equations seem obscure, write out some simple examples. Problem 9 3: Prove: If m, n, q, and r and integers, then the set of common divisors of m and n is the same as the set of common...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online