MATH
notes 1

# notes 1 - Euler product of(s Paul Garrett...

• Notes
• 4

This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

( August 24, 2013 ) Euler product of ζ ( s ) Paul Garrett [email protected] http: / / e garrett/ [This document is 2013-14/01a Euler product.pdf] Euler’s discovery that X n =1 1 n s = Y p prime 1 1 - p - s (for Re( s ) > 1) using the geometric series expansion 1 1 - p - s = 1 + p - s + ( p 2 ) - s + ( p 3 ) - s + . . . and unique factorization in Z , may or may not seem intuitive, although we should certainly revise our intuitions to make this a fundamental fact of nature. This note’s concern is convergence of the infinite product of these geometric series to the sum expression for ζ ( s ), in Re( s ) > 1. All the worse if the Euler product seems intuitive, it is surprisingly non-trivial to carry out a detailed verification of the Euler factorization. Ideas about convergence were different in 1750 than now. It is not accurate to glibly claim that the Cauchy- Weierstraß ε - δ viewpoint gives the only possible correct notion of convergence , since A. Robinson’s 1966 non-standard analysis offers a rigorous modernization of Leibniz’, Euler’s, and others’ use of infinitesimals and unlimited natural numbers to reach similar goals. [1] Thus, although an ε - δ discussion is alien to Euler’s viewpoint, it is more familiar to contemporary readers, and we conduct the discussion in such terms. [0.1] The main issue One central point is the discrepancy between finite products of finite geometric series involving primes, and finite sums of natural numbers. For example, for T > 1, because every positive integer n < T is a product of prime powers p m < T in a unique manner, Y prime p<T X m : p m <T 1 p ms - X n<T 1 n s < X n T 1 | n s | since the finitely-many leftovers from the product produce integers n T at most once each. The latter sum goes to 0 as T → ∞ , for fixed Re( s ) > 1, by comparison with an integral. The finite sums n<T 1 /n s are the usual partial sums of the infinite sum, and (simple) convergence is the assertion that this sequence converges to n 1 /n s . Thus, this already proves that lim T →∞ Y prime p<T X m : p m <T 1 p ms = X n 1 1 n s [1] A. Robinson’s Non-standard Analysis , North-Holland, 1966 was epoch-making, and really did justify some of the profoundly intuitive ideas in L. Euler’s Introductio in Analysin Infinitorum , Opera Omnia, Tomi Primi, Lausanne, 1748. E. Nelson’s reformulation Internal set theory, a new approach to NSA , Bull. AMS 83 (1977), 1165-1198, significantly improved the usability of these ideas. A. Robert’s Non-standard Analysis

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.
• Spring '14
• PaulGarrett
• Math, Mathematical analysis, Summation, Partially ordered set, infinite product

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### What students are saying

• As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern