These figures illustrate the large impact of

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: f the incentive (panel B). These figures illustrate the large impact of receiving an incentive on attendance. Error bars are also presented showing precisely estimated effects. Figure 4, panel A, presents the impact of distance of residence from the nearest results center on attendance, estimated by a nonparametric, locally weighted regression (Jianqing Fan 1992). Distance had a strong negative effect on attendance, especially pronounced among those living farther than 1.5 kilometers from the results center. To measure the demand for learning HIV results in a regression framework, I estimate: (1) GotResultsij 5 a 1 b1 Anyij 1 b2 Amtij 1 b3 Amt2 1 b4 Distij 1 b5 Dist2 1 X9 m 1 eij . ij ij ij Attendance at the VCT center is indicated by GotResults 5 1 for person i in village j. Any indicates if the respondent received any nonzero voucher and Amt is the dollar amount of the incentive. Including the binary indicator as well as the squared term allows for nonlinear effects of the incentive. Dist is the number of kilometers from the randomly placed VCT center assigned to person i. A vector of controls, X, includes covariates of gender, age, age-squared, HIV status, and district dummies, as well as a control for a simulated average distance in each VCT zone. Because the locations of the centers were chosen randomly, as opposed to randomly assigning the distance needed to travel, I draw 1,000 simulated random locations in each VCT zone and calculate the average distance of each tested respondent from each of the 1,000 simulated locations. I average this distance for each respondent and take the mean across all respondents living in each zone.9 Standard errors are clustered by village, for 119 villages.10 Although the dependent variable is binary, the linear specifications do not differ greatly from estimations from probits; both results are presented (see also Joshua D. Angrist 2001). Seeking HIV results was highly responsive to incentives. The average VCT center attendance of those receiving any positive-valued voucher is more than twice that of those receiving no possible that individuals overestimate the potential psychological effects of receiving an HIV diagnosis (Tim Wilson and Dan Gilbert 2003...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 01/28/2014.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online