M o ne f unctio n to ano ther fo r example an o rder

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: o nents o f the value chain and f o ur suppo rting co mpo nents. The primary co mpo nents are: Inbo und lo gistics—getting needed materials and o ther inputs into the f irm f ro m suppliers Operatio ns—turning inputs into pro ducts o r services Outbo und lo gistics—delivering pro ducts o r services to co nsumers, distributio n centers, retailers, o r o ther partners Marketing and sales—custo mer engagement, pricing, pro mo tio n, and transactio n Suppo rt—service, maintenance, and custo mer suppo rt The seco ndary co mpo nents are: Firm infrastructure—f unctio ns that suppo rt the who le f irm, including general management, planning, IS, and f inance Human reso urce management—recruiting, hiring, training, and develo pment Techno lo gy / research and dev elo pment—new pro duct and pro cess design P ro curement—so urcing and purchasing f unctio ns While the value chain is typically depicted as it’s displayed in the f igure belo w, go o ds and inf o rmatio n do n’t necessarily f lo w in a line f ro m o ne f unctio n to ano ther. Fo r example, an o rder taken by the marketing f unctio n can trigger an inbo und lo gistics f unctio n to get co mpo nents f ro m a supplier, o peratio ns f unctio ns (to build a pro duct if it’s no t available), o r o utbo und lo gistics f unctio ns (to ship a pro duct when it’s available). Similarly, inf o rmatio n f ro m service suppo rt can be f ed back to advise research and develo pment (R&D) in the design o f f uture pro ducts. Figure 2. 2 The Value Chain When a f irm has an imitatio n-resistant value chain—o ne that’s to ugh f o r rivals to co py in a way that yields similar benef its—then a f irm may have a critical co mpetitive asset. Fro m a strategic perspective, managers can use the value chain f ramewo rk to co nsider a f irm’s dif f erences and distinctiveness co mpared to rivals. If a f irm’s value chain can’t be co pied by co mpetito rs witho ut engaging in painf ul trade-o f f s, o r if the f irm’s value chain helps to create and strengthen o ther strategic assets o ver time, it can be a key so urce f o r co mpetitive advantage. Many o f the examples used in this bo o k, including FreshDirect, Amazo n, and Zara, illustrate this po int. An analysis o f a f irm’s value chain can also reveal o peratio nal weaknesses, and techno lo gy is o f ten o f great benef it to impro ving the speed and quality o f executio n. Firms can o f ten buy so f tware to impro ve things, and to o ls such as supply chain management (SCM; linking inbo und and o utbo und lo gistics with o peratio ns), custo mer relatio nship management (CRM; suppo rting sales, marketing, and in so me cases R&D), and enterprise reso urce planning so f tware (ERP ; so f tware implemented in mo dules to auto mate the entire value chain), can have a big impact o n mo re ef f iciently integrating the activities within the f irm, as well as with its suppliers and custo mers. But remember, these so f tware to o ls can be purchased by co mpetito rs, to o . While valuable, such so f tware may no t yield lasting co mpetitive advantage if it can be easily matched by co mpetito rs as well. There’s po tential danger here. If a f irm ado pts so f tware that changes a unique pro cess into a generic o ne, it may have co -o pted a key so urce o f co mpetitive advantage particularly if o ther f irms can buy the same stuf f . This isn’t a pro blem with so mething like acco unting so f tware. Acco unting pro cesses are standardized and acco unting isn’t a so urce o f co mpetitive advantage, so mo st f irms buy rather than build their o wn acco unting so f tware. But using packaged, thirdparty SCM, CRM, and ERP so f tware typically requires ado pting a very specif ic way o f do ing things, using so f tware and metho ds that can be purchased and ado pted by o thers. During its perio d o f P C-industry do minance, Dell sto pped deplo yment o f the lo gistics and manuf acturing mo dules o f a packaged ERP implementatio n when it realized that the so f tware wo uld require the f irm to make changes to its unique and highly successf ul o perating mo del and that many o f the f irm’s unique supply chain advantages wo uld change to the po int where the f irm was do ing the same thing using the same so f tware as its co mpetito rs. By co ntrast, Apple had no pro blem ado pting third-party ERP so f tware because the f irm co mpetes o n pro duct uniqueness rather than o peratio nal dif f erences. Dell’s Struggles: Nothing Lasts Forever Michael Dell enjo yed an extended run that to o k him f ro m assembling P Cs in his do rm ro o m as an undergraduate at the University o f Texas at Austin to heading the largest P C f irm o n the planet. Fo r years Dell’s superef f icient, vertically integrated manuf acturing and direct-to co nsumer mo del co mbined to help the f irm earn seven times mo re pro f it o n its o wn systems when co mpared with co mparably co nf igured rival P Cs.B. Breen, “Living in Dell Time,” Fast Co mpany, Dece...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 01/31/2014.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online