This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: planning the acts of
justice or charity which will probably be their duty tomorrow. The duty of planning the morrow's work is today's duty;
though its material is borrowed from the future, the duty, like all duties, is in the Present. This is not straw splitting. He
does not want men to give the Future their hearts, to place their treasure in it. We do. His ideal is a man who, having
worked all day for the good of posterity (if that is his vocation), washes his mind of the whole subject, commits the
issue to Heaven, and returns at once to the patience or gratitude demanded by the moment that is passing over him. But
we want a man hag-ridden by the Future—haunted by visions of an imminent heaven or hell upon earth—ready to
break the Enemy's commands in the present if by so doing we make him think he can attain the one or avert the other—
dependent for his faith on the success or failure of schemes whose end he will not live to see. We want a whole race
perpetually in pursuit of the rainbow's end, never honest, nor kind, nor happy now, but always using as mere fuel
wherewith to heap the altar of the future every real gift which is offered them in the Present.
It follows then, in general, and other things being equal, that it is better for your patient to be filled with anxiety or hope
(it doesn't much matter which) about this war than for him to be living in the present. But the phrase "living in the
present" is ambiguous. It may describe a process which is really just as much concerned with the Future as anxiety
itself. Your man may be untroubled about the Future, not because he is concerned with the Present, but because he has
persuaded himself that the Future is, going to be agreeable. As long as that is the real course of his tranquillity, his
tranquillity will do us good, because it is only piling up more disappointment, and therefore more impatience, for him
when his false hopes are dashed. If, on the other hand, he is aware that horrors may be in store for him and is praying
for the virtues, wherewith to meet them, and meanwhile concerning himself with the Present because there, and there
alone, all duty, all grace, all knowledge, and all pleasure dwell, his state is very undesirable and should be attacked at
once. Here again, our Philological Arm has done good work; try the word "complacency" on him. But, of course, it is
most likely that he is "living in the Present" for none of these reasons but simply because his health is good and he is
enjoying his work. The phenomenon would then be merely natural. All the same, I should break it up if I were you. No
natural phenomenon is really in our favour. And anyway, why should the creature be happy?
Your affectionate uncle
http://members.fortunecity.com/phantom1/books2/c._s._lewis_-_the_screwtape_letters.htm 2/07/2008 THE SCREWTAPE LETTERS Page 17 of 34 MY DEAR WORMWOOD,
You mentioned casually in your last letter that the patient has continued to attend one church, and one only, since...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 02/07/2014 for the course MIS 304 taught by Professor Mejias during the Spring '07 term at University of Arizona- Tucson.
- Spring '07