6EC03_01_que_20110617

Ece the times february 18 2010 thorntons plays hard

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: tract  Kraft takes over Cadbury to become world’s biggest confectioner Kraft’s offer to buy Cadbury was accepted by Cadbury’s board on 19 January 2010. Kraft, the US food giant, will pay £11.7 billion for Cadbury in cash and shares, some 50% more than the firm’s value before the bidding started in September. Kraft’s acquisition may be a good deal for both companies. Kraft has little presence in Britain’s confectionery market, where Cadbury is strong, but it has thriving businesses in mainland Europe and Russia where Cadbury has made minimal progress. Cadbury is strong in India and various Commonwealth countries, and has a booming chewing-gum business, particularly in Europe and Latin America, an area where Kraft has little expertise. Between them they can make up lost ground in China, where Mars holds the upper hand. The deal is also set to yield cost savings of £414m a year for the combined firm, operating at a larger scale in emerging markets. This is a good deal for most Cadbury’s workers. However, the fact that so much of the deal is financed by debt is a negative: borrowing that looks cheap today could double in price tomorrow. That would eat up the cost savings on marketing and administration already factored into the purchase price, and perhaps force undesirable cuts to operations. Cadbury is already efficient: under its current management it has reduced costs significantly, for example, by off-shoring more of its operations. 5 10 15 Three-quarters of mergers result in a fall in short run profits. In such a sensitive consumer sector, the risks of a culture clash and brand destruction are high. That is what happened to Terry’s, a smaller York-based chocolate company bought by Kraft in 1993. Terry’s has lost visibility in Britain since production was relocated to central Europe in 2005. The same problem could await Cadbury. 20 There are understandable fears that foreign owners will be more likely than domestic ones to axe British jobs or use British profits to pay off their global debts. But all successful big firms, British and foreign alike, respond to the demands and opportunities of the global marketplace these days, and, as Cadbury’s current managers have shown, their behaviour is rarely determined by their nationality. 25 The management practices of multinational companies tend to be better than the average in any country they operate in. In theory, then, Kraft’s takeover of a British firm should bring better management to Britain. One problem: Cadbury is itself a multinational, and in no need of lessons from Kraft. 30 Source: adapted from http://bit.ly/89Azni ‘Cadbury goes American. Is this healthy for British manufacturing? ‘ The Economist Jan 19th 2010 and http://bit.ly/aaFiRe Jan 21st 2010 ‘Manufacturing blues: Another one bites the dust’ Jan 21st 2010 Extract 3 Kraft to close Cadbury plant it offered to keep open Kraft Foods has gone back on its promise to keep open a Cadbury factory in Somerdale near Bristol, just weeks after the British chocolate maker accepted its £11.7 billion offer. The plant, which employs 400 staff, will be closed in 2011. The Unite union said: “This sends the worst possible message to the 6,000 oth...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/09/2014 for the course ECON 101 taught by Professor Womer during the Fall '08 term at NYU.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online