Varsity-Packet-Final

7 while both of those agencies constructed some

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: aise taxes, http://www.wwlp.com/dpp/news/massachusetts/state-budget-raises-education-spending-doesnt-raisetaxes) Governor Deval Patrick has signed a new state budget, after taking the maximum 10 full days to review spending for the next fiscal year. The budget totals $32.5 billion, and includes a 4.5% increase in public school funding from last year. In fact, it provides for the most money that the Commonwealth has ever spent on education. 21 | P a g e States CP BDL Article: Federal Infrastructure Investment By Chris Edwards, http://www.cato.org/publications/congressional-testimony/federal-infrastructureinvestment?print Joint Economic Committee United States Congress Joint Economic Committee United States Congress Added to cato.org on November 16, 2011 This testimony was delivered on November 16, 2011. Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, thank you for inviting me to testify t oday. My comments will examine the federal role in the nation's infrastructure. In the description of today's hearing, the committee asked how infrastructure helps to promote growth, jobs, and manufacturing. The short answer is that we can spur growth by e nsuring that America's infrastructure investment is as efficient as possible. Infrastructure funding should be allocated to the highest-value projects, and those projects should be constructed and maintained in the most cost-effective manner. My testimony will discuss why reducing the federal role in infrastructure will help to increase the efficiency of our investment. The first thing to note about America's infrastructure is that most of it is not provided by the government, but by the private sector. A broad measure of private infrastructure spending — on items such as buildings, factories, freight rail, pipelines, and refineries — is much larger than government infrastructure spending on items such as roads and airports. In Figure 1, data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis show that private gross fixed investment was $1.7 trillion in 2010, which compared to gross fixed investment by federal, state, and local governments of $505 billion. 1 W hen defense investment is excluded, government infrastructure spending was just $388 billion, or less than one-quarter of private infrastructure spending. One implication of this data is that if Congress wants to boost infrastructure spending, the first priority should be to make reforms to encourage private investment. Tax reforms, such as a corporate tax rate cut, would increase the net returns to a broad range of private infrastructure investments. Regulatory reforms to reduce barriers to investment are also needed, as illustrated by the delays in approving the $7 bil lion Keystone XL pipeline from Alberta to Texas. Despite its smaller magnitude, public-sector infrastructure spending is also very important to the U.S. economy. But the usual recommendation to simply spend more federal taxpayer money on infrastructure is misguided. For one thing, the government simply can't afford more spending given its massive ongoing deficits. More importantly, much o...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 02/06/2014.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online