This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: : Summariz e one of the classical argume nts for innate knowle dge pre se nte d by the authors (1
se nte nce ). In anothe r se nte nce indicate whe the r or not you agre e with the ir conclusion about it
and why you do/don’t (1 se nte nce ).
One of the c las s ic al argum ents for innate knowledge has to do with behavioral s pec ific ity, nam ely that
languages are unique in their s c ope and nature. I agree that language is unique is its s c ope but that does
not nec es s itate innate knowledge of language; s om ething c an be learned and s till quite unique in s c ope....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 02/09/2014 for the course COGS 101c taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at UCSD.
- Spring '08