lecture1 notes

# lecture1 notes - Lecture 1 Linear Response Theory Last...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

Lecture 1: Linear Response Theory Last semester in 8.511, we discussed linear response theory in the context of charge screening and the free-fermion polarization function. This theory can be extended to a much wider range of areas, however, and is a very useful tool in solid state physics. We’ll begin this semester by going back and studying linear response theory again with a more formal approach, and then returning to this like superconductivity a bit later. 1.1 Response Functions and the Interaction Representation In solid state physics, we ordinarily think about many-body systems, with something on the order of 10 23 particles. With so many particles, it is usually impossible to even think about a wave function for the whole system. As a result, it is often more useful for us to think in terms of the macroscopic observable behaviors of systems rather than their particular microscopic states. One example of such a macroscopic property is the magnetic susceptibility χ H ∂M , which ∂H is a measure of the response of the net magnetization M of a system to an applied magnetic field H ( r, t ). This is the type of behavior we will be thinking about: we can mathematically probe the system with some perturbing external probe or field ( e.g. H ( r, t )), and try to predict what the system’s response will be in terms of the expectation values of some observable quantities. Let ˆ H be the full many-body Hamiltonian for some isolated system that we are interested in. We spent most of 8.511 thinking about how to solve for the behavior of a system governed by ˆ H . As interesting as that behavior may be, we will now consider that to be a solved problem. That ˆ is, we will assume the existence of a set of eigenkets {| n �} that diagonalize H with associated eigenvalues (energies) E n . In addition to ˆ H , we now turn on an external probe potential V ˆ , such that the total Hamil- tonian H T ot satisfies: ˆ ˆ H T ot = H + V ˆ (1.1) In particular, we are interested in probe potentials that arise from the coupling of some external scalar or vector field to some sort of “density” in the sample. For example, the external field can be an electric potential U ( r, t ), which couples to the electronic charge density ρ ˆ( r ) such that ˆ V = d� r ˆ ρ ( r ) U ( r, t ) (1.2) V where the electron density operator ˆ ρ ( r ) is given by N ˆ ρ ( r ) = δ ( r r i ) (1.3) i =1 1

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
Response Functions and the Interaction Representation 2 In first quantized language, with r� i being the position of electron i the N -electron system. In second quantized notation, recall ρ ˆ( r ) = Ψ ( r ) Ψ ( r ) (1.4) where Ψ ( r ) and Ψ ( r ) are the electron field creation and annihilation operators, respectively.
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### What students are saying

• As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern