FractionalGeometry-Chap2

# tn a t a b moreover for any compact set d r2 lim

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: lying again the kind of calculation introduced in Fig. 2.15, we see h(A1 , B1 ) = 1/4, h(A2 , B2 ) = 1/8, and h(A1 ∪ A2 , B1 ∪ B2 ) = 1/4. Consequently, h(A1 ∪ A2 , B1 ∪ B2 ) = max{h(A1 , B1 ), h(A2 , B2 )}. Is the result of Example 2.3.2 always true? Remember, proofs are near the end of the section, just before the Practice problems. Lemma 2.3.1 h(U ∪ V, W ∪ X ) ≤ max{h(U, W ), h(V, X )}. Now we relate the h-contraction factor of T viewed as function T : K(R2 ) → K(R2 ) to the d-contraction factor of T viewed as a function T : R2 → R2 . Lemma 2.3.2 If T : R2 → R2 is a d-contraction with contraction factor r, then for all compact sets A and B in R2 , h(T (A), T (B )) ≤ r · h(A, B ). 46 CHAPTER 2. ITERATED FUNCTION SYSTEMS Combining Lemmas 2.3.1 and 2.3.2, we show T is an h-contraction, and deduce its contraction factor. First, we shall see what Example 2.3.1 shows about this issue. Recall h(A, B ) = 1 and h(T (A), T (B )) = 1/4. It is easy to see the d-contraction factors of T...
View Full Document

## This document was uploaded on 02/14/2014 for the course MATH 290B at Yale.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online