Unformatted text preview: fractals. Of course, the changes presented in
Fig. 2.55 aren’t exactly small.
On the right of Fig. 2.55 we see the eﬀect of θ1 = ϕ1 = 0.01. Holding the
page at arm’s length, or squinting slightly, we see that the changes between
this shape and the gasket are imperceptible. On the other hand, topological
characteristisc, such as being connected, are discrete: a set is connected or
not connected, there is no middle ground. Even this tiny change in θ1 = ϕ1
disconnects the attractor. Topological changes are abrupt, as they must be.
Back to Fig. 2.55, we see the attractor appears to be connected again at
θ1 = ϕ1 = π . Are there other angles giving connected attractors? Look at θ1 =
ϕ1 = π/4. These attractors are not connected, but suppose θ1 = ϕ1 were slightly
√
larger than π/4. Say enough that the line joining T1 (1, 0) and T1 (1/2, 3/2)
passes through the point T3 (0, 0). Would thiat attractor be connected?
For now, the last topological question we ask about IFS involves the topological types of the attractors of IFS consisting of t...
View
Full
Document
This document was uploaded on 02/14/2014 for the course MATH 290B at Yale.
 Fall '14
 AmandaFolsom
 Geometry, Fractal Geometry, Limits, The Land

Click to edit the document details