ajaz_204_2013_2014_HW_5

C as youve shown in part b assuming that at least one

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: she’ll expend her entire income (budget). (c) As you’ve shown in part (b), assuming that at least one good (say good 1) the consumer’s UMP becomes: ( ) ⏟ ⏟ Use the envelope theorem to interpret the Lagrange multipliers (i.e. after you solve the UMP, what will the Lagrange multipliers tell you?). Answer: The UMP is: ( ) ⏟ ⏟ Here, the consumer must consume at least zero units of goods 1 and 2. More generally, the consumer might have to consume at least units of good 1 and at least of good 2. As such, we can re-state the problem as: 4 University of Toronto, Department of Economics, ECO 204, 2013 - 2014 ( ( ) ⏟ ) ( ) The Lagrangian equation would be: ( ) [ [ [ The FOCs and KT conditions would be: ⏟ ⏟ [ [ [ From the FOCs and KT conditions we see that at the optimal solution the optimal value of the Lagrangian equation will be (make sure you know why): ( ) [⏟ ( ⏟[ ⏟[ ) The optimal value of the Lagrangian equals the optimal value of the utility function. Thus, a chang...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online