6 Options II

# 53 1 you have hs t 23121 8067 of asset but pay

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: The Put- Call Parity Theorem. 1) By Replication #1, {AT} ≡ {LT}, so portfolio A must cost the same as portfolio L. 2) A0 = L0 ⇒ D0 + Ke−rT + c = S0 + p, or c + Ke−rT = p + (S0 – D0). 2. Put- Call Relationships for American Options: a) There is no put- call parity theorem for American options, but there are upper and lower bounds on the difference in premiums C – P: (S0 – D0) – K ≤ C – P ≤ S0 – Ke−rT. b) For the lower bound, consider Portfolios M and J below. 1) Portfolio M = {one European call (strike K, maturity T), plus cash = D0 +K}. • Cost today is M0 = c + D0 + K. • At time T, {MT} = (D0 + K)erT − K + max {ST, K}. o If ST < K, option expires; you have MT = (D0 + K)erT in cash o If ST > K, exercise option, spend K to buy stock worth ST; MT = (D0+K)erT − K + ST 2) Portfolio J = {one American put option with same K and T, plus one share of stock}. • Cost today is J0 = P + S0. • Case 1 - - if the option is not exercised early, then Portfolio J is the same as Portfolio L above, and {JT} = D0 erT + max {ST, K}. • Case 2 - - if the option is exercised at τ < T, then Sτ < K and you sell stock for K. o If no dividends paid by time τ, Jτ = K o If dividends paid before time τ, Jτ = D0 erτ + K 3) Portfolio M is always worth more than Portfolio J, even if D = 0. • At T, {MT} = (D0 + K)erT − K + max {ST, K} > D0 erT + max {ST, K} = {JT}. o So MT > JT for Case 1 • At τ < T, Mτ is worth at least the cash (D0 + K)erτ > D0 erτ + K > K. o So Mτ > Jτ for Case 2 4) By Replication #2, it must be the case that Portfolio M costs at least as much as J. • M0 ≥ J0 ⇒ c + D0 + K ≥ P + S0 and c – P ≥ (S0 – D0) – K. • But C ≥ c, so C − P ≥ (S0 – D0) − K, or (S0 – D0) − K ≤ C – P Ec 174 OPTIONS II p. 9 of 18 c) For the upper...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online