Instead of real act ivit y the viewer is offered a ct

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: sible. 25. Liam Gillick, “A Guide to Video Conferencing Systems and the Role of the Building Worker in Relat ion to the Contemporar y Art Exhibit ion (Backst age),” in Gillick, Five or Six (New York: Lukas and Sternberg, 2000), p. 9. As Gillick notes, scenar io thinking is a tool to propose change, even while it is “inherent ly linked to capit alism and the strategizing that goes with it .” This is because it compr ises “one of t he key component s required in order to maint ain t he level of mobilit y and reinvent ion required to provide the dynamic aura of so - called free-market economies” (Gillick, “Prevision: Should the Future Help the Past?,” Five or Six, p. 27). 26. Gillick in Renovat ion Filter, p. 16. As Alex Farquhar son has noted, “ The operat ive phrase here is ‘might be possible.’ Whereas Rirkr it can reasonably expect his v isitor s to eat his Thai noodles, it is unlikely that Liam’s audience will do his reassessing. Instead of real act ivit y, the viewer is offered a fict ional role, an approach shared by Gonzalez-Foer ster and Parreno” (Alex Farquhar son, “Curator and Art ist ,” Art Monthly 270 [October 2003], p. 14). 62 OCTOBER defense of relat ional aesthet ics.27 The theoret ical underpinnings of this desire to act ivate the viewer are easy to reel off: Walter Benjamin’s “Author as Producer” (1934), Roland Barthes’s “Death of the Author” and “birth of the reader” (1968) and—most import ant for t his context—Umberto Eco’s The Open Work (1962). Wr it ing on what he perceived to be the open and aleator y character of modernist literature, music, and art , Eco summar izes his discussion of James Joyce, Luciano Ber io, and Alexander Calder in terms t hat cannot help but evoke Bourr iaud’s opt imism: The poet ics of the “work in movement” (and part ly that of the “open” work) set s in mot ion a new cycle of relat ions bet ween the art ist and his audience, a new mechanics of aesthet ic percept ion, a different st atus for the art ist ic product in contemporar y societ y. It opens a new page in sociolog y and in pedagog y, as well as a new chapter in the histor y of art . It poses new pract ical problems by organizing new communicat ive situat ions. In short , it inst alls a new relat ionship bet ween the contemplat ion and the ut ilizat ion of a work of art .28 Analogies with Tiravanija and Gillick are evident in Eco’s pr ivileging of use value and t he development of “communicat ive situat ions.” However, it is Eco’s cont e n t i o n t h a t e v e r y w o r k o f a r t i s p o t e n t i a l l y “ o p e n ,” s i n c e i t m a y p r o d u c e a n unlimited range of possible readings; it is simply the achievement of contempor a r y a r t , m u s i c , a n d l i t e r a t u r e t o h a v e f o r e g r o u n d e d t h i s f a c t . 29 B o u r r i a u d misinterpret s these argument s by applying them to a specific t ype of work (those that require literal interac...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 02/20/2014 for the course PHILOSOPHY 244 at University of Tennessee.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online