Fabiszak_M_Conceptual_Metaphor

8 abu lughod 2003 in her rejoinder to roxborough

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: the battlefield, but also entail a transformation of the entire social life. Hooks also refers to Elias’ (1939 [1982]) study of the civilising process. Elias claims that modern Western culture, in which states, but not private people, can wage wars, is a result of the transformation of the military power and pacification of medieval warlords. Meyer et al. (1997) extend this view and claim that the freedom of military action on the part of nation states is further curbed, and can be interpreted as the civilising of the state.7 When it comes to the evaluation of Roxborough’s position on the American war with Iraq, Hooks dissents from the former’s classification of this war as a defensive war on terror. He believes that, in fact it was an aggressive war, whose main aim was to ascertain American domination in the Middle East. This disagreement between two sociologists clearly shows that the categorisation of war as defensive or aggressive is yet another artificial dichotomy, which can be used as a rhetorical exercise. The multi-causal nature of war does not allow for such clear-cut labelling. Hooks also distrusts the idea of sociologists working for the government. In his opinion such involvement may lead to a misuse of information on the part of the government, as was the case with the Project Camelot he describes. Within this project, sociologists were to assist the CIA in understanding the nature of social revolutions. However, the information gathered allowed the CIA to identify potential revolutionaries, and to disclose their identity to their governments, which in turn led to their capture, torture and murder.8 Abu-Lughod (2003) in her rejoinder to Roxborough hypothesised that the destabilisation of Iraq might not result from a failure of American 7 The Second Gulf War in Iraq waged by the US without the UN or even NATO mandate goes counter to this trend. 8 Knightly (1975) voices similar ethical concern when it comes to the role of war reporters. Some of them, by sharing information with their governments, come dangerously close to espionage, others become a propaganda instrument in the hands of censoring authorities, see also Section 6 of this chapter. 90 Chapter III state-re-construction policy, but may have been the political aim of the military action. She also stresses that it is not enough to talk about political or military elites as the authors of war. In fact, particular politicians should be held responsible for the war. In this, her position on war comes close to the tendency identified by Meyer et al., and quoted by Hooks, i.e. the civilising of the state. Her belief in the importance of agency in the war-process also coincides with the understanding of history as constructed by the great leaders more, or at least as much as, by the unidentified social, economic, political and cultural forces. Centeno (2003) once again focuses on the American military doctrine based on technological advantage and strategic management. He draws an...
View Full Document

This essay was uploaded on 02/24/2014 for the course LING 1100 taught by Professor Friedman during the Fall '09 term at Cornell.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online