Cj9 1933 here again sense 4 is used in the meaning of

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: the concordance lines, therefore the method was abandoned. 204 Chapter V 4. The Pragglejaz Procedure The presentation of this procedure is based on the Panel Discussion: “Finding Metaphor in natural discourse: report on applying the Pragglejaz procedure”, which took place at the 6th Researching and Applying Metaphor (RAAM) Conference in Leeds, April 10-12, 2006. The panellists were: Gerard Steen, Ewa Biernacka, Lettie Dorst, Anna Kaal, Irene López-Rodríguez, and Tryntje Pasma, who participate in two research programmes conducted at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, i.e. “Metaphor in discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures, cognitive representations” and “Conversationalisation of public discourse”. Pragglejaz was developed through a cooperation of 10 metaphor researchers: P R A G G L E J A Z eter Crisps, Chinese University Hong Kong, Hong Kong ay Gibbs, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz CA, USA lan Cienki, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA raham Low, University of York, York, UK erard Steen, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands ynne Cameron, University of Leeds, UK lena Semino, Lancaster University, UK oe Grady, Cultural Logic LLC, Washington DC, USA lice Deignan, University of Leeds, UK oltán Kövecses, Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary.3 They set the goal of developing a reliable procedure for metaphor identification and proposed the following steps: 1) Decide about words. The word as the lexical unit examined for metaphorical use. 2) Establish the contextual meaning of the examined word. 3) Determine the basic meaning of the word on the basis of the dictionary (Most concrete, human oriented as opposed to specific or vague). 4) Decide whether the basic meaning of the word is sufficiently distinct from the contextual meaning. 3 The presentation of the researchers and the formulation of the five steps of the procedure given below are a verbatim quote from the handout distributed during the panel. Words from the lexical field of war and their metaphoric potential 205 5) Decide whether the contextual meaning of the word can be related to the more basic meaning by some form of similarity. 6) If yes, mark the lexical unit as metaphorical. With regard to point 1, the pool of words has already been established in Section 2. The way in which I employ the remaining instructions is shown in an example below. The first word on the most frequent list of the ‘war’ words in my data was the noun forces, which, however, was considered a metaphorical use of the word force, therefore it is not considered in my analysis as it could blur the possible mappings by originating outside the investigated domain. For the second word, the adjective military, 200 random hits from the BNC were examined and considered by the present researcher as non-metaphorical uses of the word. The third most frequent word, attack,4 turned out to present a panoply of uses and is therefore suitable as the test example for the procedure...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online