They also expand their approach with a socio cultural

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: sewhere that the relationship between language and thought is instead a two-way interaction within a single complex system. In this view metaphor emerges from a dynamics of language and thinking, and is at the same time conceptual and linguistic. Furthermore our data suggest that the affective – the beliefs, attitudes, values, and emotions of participants – plays a central, but often neglected, role in the emergence of particular forms of metaphor. They develop their emergentist discourse approach to metaphor further and say: Metaphorical language and metaphorical thinking are therefore interdependent, each affecting the other in the dynamic and dialogic processes of talking-and-thinking (Cameron – Deignan 2006: 675). They also expand their approach with a socio-cultural dimension: … metaphor, like most other uses of language, is designed for other people and for particular discourse purposes. An important dimension of the dialogics of metaphor is its use to express affect and attitude along with the ideational content (Cameron – Deignan 2006: 676). 36 Chapter I This approach to metaphor seems to be akin to the approach transparent in Nerlich – Clark (2002) presented above, who stress the importance of language system in the study of metaphor. The emphasis on the role of metaphor in the expression of affect and the values of the speaker is also discussed in reference to frame shifting (Coulson 2001) and axiological semantics (Krzeszowski 1993, 1997) in Sections 6 and 7, respectively. All of these studies constitute the theoretical foundation for Chapter Four in which I analyse the use of linguistic metaphor in war reports to identify its function in war discourse in different times and languages. The presentation of data on a selected military conflict as represented in one newspaper is divided into three parts: paragraph-structuring metaphors, isolated metaphors, and other rhetorical strategies. Paragraphstructuring metaphors are lexical realisations of a single conceptual metaphor underlying larger portions of text, such as a paragraph or an entire article. They play an important discourse-structuring function. Isolated metaphors are also linguistic expressions motivated by conceptual metaphors, but their impact on discourse is limited to one sentence or sentence fragment only. Other rhetorical strategies may, or may not be motivated by conceptual metaphors but they contribute to the overall imagery and often enhance the rhetorical effect of the text. The next section gives a brief overview of the Conceptual Metaphor Theory to consolidate the presentation so far. Then we turn to other conceptual structures (ICM, image schemata, force dynamics) organizing our mental processes to finish with Blending Theory and axiological semantics. 2.8. The systemization of metaphors Kövecses (2002) offers a comprehensive outline of the state of the art of metaphor research. He structures the taxonomy of metaphors around four coinciding dimensions: conventionality, function, nature and the level of generality. Both conceptual and linguistic meta...
View Full Document

This essay was uploaded on 02/24/2014 for the course LING 1100 taught by Professor Friedman during the Fall '09 term at Cornell.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online