This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: nd Mathematics Assessments. TRENDS IN ACADEMIC PROGRESS 2012 4 5 C OURSETAKING Thirteenyearolds taking a regular mathematics course
score lower than those taking algebra
Implicit in the recent push for higher academic standards is the hope that more challenging coursework will prepare students for their future education and careers. Information about coursetaking
collected as part of the longterm trend mathematics assessment reflects some movement in that
direction. Thirteenyearolds were asked, “What kind of mathematics are you taking this year?” and
were given the following five response options:
• I am not taking mathematics this year
• Regular mathematics
• Prealgebra
• Algebra
• Other
As might be expected, students engaging in more challenging mathematics coursework tend to
perform higher than those taking lower level courses. In 2012, students taking a regular mathematics
course scored lower on average than those who reported taking prealgebra or algebra (figure 32).
Students taking algebra also scored higher than those taking prealgebra.
Figure 32. Percentage of students and average scores in NAEP mathematics for 13yearolds,
by type of mathematics taken during the school year: 2012 NOTE: An average score is not shown for students who selected the “not taking mathematics” response because the sample size was insufficient
to permit a reliable estimate. Detail may not sum to totals because results are not shown for students who reported not taking mathematics. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),
2012 LongTerm Trend Mathematics Assessment. 4 6 THE NATION’S REPORT CARD COURSETAKING Percentage of 13yearolds taking algebra increasing NAEP first collected information on mathematics coursetaking at age 13 in 1986. Since that time,
the percentage of 13yearolds taking algebra has doubled and the percentage taking prealgebra
has also increased (figure 33). NCES recently released Algebra I and Geometry Curricula: Results From
the 2005 High School Transcript Mathematics Curriculum Study. This study explored differences in the
content of algebra I and geometry courses. The study also examined the accuracy of school course
titles and descriptions in relation to the rigor of what is taught in algebra I and geometry. The
results of the study are available at http:/
/nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/hsts/math_curriculum/.
Figure 33. Trend in percentage of 13yearold students assessed in NAEP mathematics,
by type of mathematics taken during the school year # Rounds to zero.
* Significantly different (p < .05) from 2012. NOTE: Results for 1986–2004 are from the original assessment format, and results for 2008 and 2012 are from the revised assessment format (2004 revised assessment format results are not available). Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),...
View
Full
Document
This document was uploaded on 02/28/2014.
 Spring '14
 The Land

Click to edit the document details