The real difference in the law of 2000 and many of

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ORK IS NOT FINISHED The work that led to the original 1991 OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard and the Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act of 2000 was remarkable. It does not mean that our work is finished, but rather, that the work to assure healthy and safe workplaces has just begun. In fact, the success of the Act will be judged on how many injuries are 27 prevented and how many frontline workers actually become involved in the implementation. The real difference in the law of 2000, and many of the state laws, lies in the active role of the frontline health care worker. In addition, many nurses and other health care workers, such as some public-sector employees, still do not have the benefit of being protected under federal or state regulations addressing needlestick/sharps injuries and exposure to bloodborne pathogens. The ANA and partnering nursing organizations will continue efforts to advocate for the passage and implementation of state laws and support the development of an OSHA state plan for states without one. In summary, the following activities led to the...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 02/27/2014 for the course ENGLISH 101 at Montgomery College.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online