ReadingAssigment (1)

And secondly by the sheerest coincidenceand entirely

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: heerest coincidence,and entirely unknown to Smith, the place mentionedin proposition(h) happensreallyto be the placewhereBrown is. If these two conditions hold then Smith does not know that (h) is true, even though (i) (h) is true, (ii) Smith does believe that (h) is true, and (iii) Smith is justifiedin believing that (h) is true. These two examplesshow that definition(a) does not state a sufficient condition for someone's knowing a given proposition. The same cases, with appropriatechanges, will suffice to show that neither definition (b) nor definition(c) do so either. S Wayne tate University CIRCULARITYAND INDUCTION By PETER ACHINSTEIN 1. DECENTLY1 I suggested why an argument proposed by Max \ Black, which attempts to support an inductive rule by citing its past success, suffers from circularity. The inductive rule under discussion is this: a R: To argue from Mostinstancesf As examined nder widevariety f u o o hbB conditionsave een to (probably)ThenextA to beencountered be will B. The argumentin favour of the rule is as follows: (a): In most instancesof the use of R in argumentswith truepremisses examinedin a wide variety of conditions, R has been successful. Henceprobably): ( In the next instanceto be encounteredof use of R in an argument with a true premiss,R will be successful. 22.6 " The Circularityof a Self-Supporting Inductive Argument ", ANALYSIS, (June 1962)....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online