KNT Presentation Notes

133 0051 0088 valence uncertainty 0028 0047 0029 0045

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: model Experimental design Reduced-form results Model estimation Beliefs about opponent (summary stats) Reference group: mail or no message Valence Ideology Double by phone by phone by phone Valence mode -0.094 [0.106] -0.043 [0.133] -0.051 [0.088] Valence uncertainty -0.028 [0.047] -0.029 [0.045] 0.008 [0.054] Ideology mode 0.023 [0.048] 0.141** [0.062] -0.016 [0.063] Ideology uncertainty -0.044 [0.028] -0.089*** [0.030] 0.001 [0.032] Units: 1,455 eligible voters. OLS coe¢ cients (mode) or Probit marginal e¤ects (uncertainty) reported. Fixed e¤ects for survey date included. Robust standard errors clustered at the precinct level in brackets. Kendall, Nannicini & Trebbi (2014): “How Do Voters Respond to Information?” Conclusion Motivation Empirical model Experimental design Reduced-form results Model estimation Conclusion Beliefs about opponent (from model estimation) Reference group: mail or no message Valence Ideology Double by phone by phone by phone Average valence -0.127 [0...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online