Bandwidth for High Speed Networks

One can think of the process of identifying

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: of identifying unfriendly ows, and then present simulation results of the identi cation algorithm in 8 ; we are not aware of other realizations of the identi cation approach. One can think of the process of identifying unfriendly ows as occurring in two logically distinct stages. The rst, and relatively easy, step is to estimate the arrival rate of a ow. The second, and harder, step is to use this arrival rate information along with the dropping rate and other aggregate measurements to decide if the ow is unfriendly. Assuming that friendly ows use a TCP-like adjustment method of increase-by-one and decrease-by-half, one can derive an expression see 8 for details for the bandwidth share S as a function of the dropping rate p, round-trip B time R, and packet size B : S  Rpp for some constant . Routers do not know the round trip time R of ows, so must use the lower bound of double the propagation delay of the attached link; this allows ows further away from the link to behave more aggressively without being identi ed as being unfriendly.12 10 As we discuss later, if ows can tolerate signi cant levels of loss, the situation changes somewhat. 11 If identi cation were perfect, and this management goal achieved, all ows would get their max-min fair allocations. However, we are not aware of any algorithm that can achieve this management goal. 12 We are not delving into some of the details of the approach layed out in 8 where ows can also be classi ed as very-high-bandwidth but not necessarily unfriendly, and as unresponsive and therefore unfriendly. Simulation 2 Algorithm UDP Simulation 1 TCP-1 TCP-2 TCP-1 TCP-2 REDI 0.906 0.280 0.278 0.565 0.891 CSFQ 0.554 0.468 0.478 0.729 0.747 Table 5: Simulation 1 The throughputs in Mbps of one UDP and two TCP ows along a 1.5 Mbps link under REDI 8 , and CSFQ, respectively. Simulation 2 The throughputs of two TCPs where TCP-2 opens its congestion window three times faster than TCP-1, under REDI, and CSFQ, respectively. To see how this occurs in practice, consider the following two experiments using the identi cati...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online