Study Notes- Criminal Defenses

G lewd conduct with a very young girl mistake of law

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: in a justified (proper) act. But, if the jury acquits the perpetrator on the ground of an excuse, the jury has determined that a crime has occurred. The perpetrator’s excuse claim is personal to him, and should not protect the accomplice. Defenses to Attempt • Factual Impossibility • Legal Impossibility Negative Defenses • Force (actus reus): One is not liable for an act that someone else forces the defendant to do • Unconsciousness (actus reus): If not self- induced, unconsciousness is a complete defense to the actus reus element and therefore to the crime. • insanity, diminished capacity/actuality, mental defect (mens rea): The defendant can use these defenses for any subjective fault crime, which requires proof of the defendant's actual intent. (This includes all specific intent crimes and a few general intent crimes that require elements of, for instance, malice or knowledge.) • intoxication (mens rea): The defendant can use a defense of intoxication for any subjective fault crime except the implied malice of a murder. Intoxication can be used as a defense for general intent crimes to disprove a required element of a general intent crime. • mistake of fact (mens rea): If the crime is not a strict liability crime, a reasonable mistake of fact concerning one of the elements of the crime is a defense. A mistake of fact is not a defense if it merely concerns the degree of the crime (e.g. selling marijuana to a minor, which is illegal even if the buyer...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 03/06/2014 for the course POLISCI 122 at Stanford.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online