Singer 2006 essay nyt

S dollar per day most of the worlds poorest people

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: rv iv e on the purchasing power equiv alent of less than one U.S. dollar per day . Most of the world’s poorest people are undernourished, lack access to safe drinking water or ev en the most basic health serv ices and cannot send their children to school. According to Unicef, more than 1 0 million children die ev ery y ear — about w w w .ny times .c om/2006/12/17/magaz ine/17c har ity .t.html?_r =0&pagew anted=pr int 1/10 Sho1/l14a1Billionair e Giv e – and What Should You? - New Yor k Times ud / 3 30,000 per day — from av oidable, pov erty - related causes. Last June the inv estor Warren Buffett took a significant step toward reducing those deaths when he pledged $31 billion to the Gates Foundation, and another $6 billion to other charitable foundations. Buffett’s pledge, set alongside the nearly $30 billion giv en by Bill and Melinda Gates to their foundation, has made it clear that the first decade of the 21 st century is a new “golden age of philanthropy .” On an inflationadjusted basis, Buffett has pledged to giv e more than double the lifetime total giv en away by two of the philanthropic giants of the past, Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, put together. Bill and Melinda Gates’s gifts are not far behind. Gates’s and Buffett’s donations will now be put to work primarily to reduce pov erty , disease and premature death in the dev eloping world. According to the Global Forum for Health Research, less than 1 0 percent of the world’s health research budget is spent on combating conditions that account for 90 percent of the global burden of disease. I n the past, diseases that affect only the poor hav e been of no commercial interest to pharmaceutical manufacturers, because the poor cannot afford to buy their products. T he Global Alliance for Vaccines and I mmunization (GAVI ), heav ily supported by the Gates Foundation, seeks to change this by guaranteeing to purchase millions of doses of v accines, when they are dev eloped, that can prev ent diseases like malaria. GAVI has also assisted dev eloping countries to immunize more people with ex isting v accines: 99 million additional children hav e been reached to date. By doing this, GAVI claims to hav e already av erted nearly 1 .7 million future deaths. Philanthropy on this scale raises many ethical questions: Why are the people who are giv ing doing so? Does it do any good? Should we praise them for giv ing so much or criticize them for not giv ing still more? I s it troubling that such momentous decisions are made by a few ex tremely wealthy indiv iduals? And how do our judgments about them reflect on our own way of liv ing? Let’s start with the question of motiv es. T he rich must — or so some of us with less money like to assume — suffer sleepless nights because of their ruthlessness in squeezing out competitors, firing workers, shutting down plants or whatev er else they hav e to do to acquire their wealth. When wealthy people giv e away money , we can alway s say that they are doing it to ease their consciences or generate fav orable publicity . I t has been suggested — by , for ex ample, Dav id Kirkpatrick, a senior editor at Fortune...
View Full Document

This homework help was uploaded on 03/04/2014 for the course PPOL 4770 taught by Professor Martin during the Spring '11 term at UVA.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online