phil122 final project

phil122 final project - 2nd Project: Singer and Hardin on...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
2 nd Project: Singer and Hardin on Charity 2. Garrett Hardin, in his essay “Living on a lifeboat,” asserts that providing aid to poor nations will lead to disaster and worsen the situation for all. When rich nations share their wealth with impoverished countries, it increases the rate of consumption in poor countries. Combined with the much higher reproductive rate in poor countries, it will lead to exponential growth in the population. The population will be beyond the capability of control and will ultimately destroy all the world’s resources. If resources are available free for everyone to use, rational self-interested individuals will lead to ruin for all. Through the metaphor of a lifeboat, Hardin proposes a situation where fifty people are on a lifeboat. Even though there are ten more seats available, allowing others to board will diminish the safety factor of the lifeboat. Hardin argues that the most rational choice to make in this situation is to admit no more onto the boat because by doing so, the lifeboat will sink. In Hardin’s words “complete justice, complete catastrophe.” The people living in rich nations (United States) are implied as the ones aboard in the lifeboat. The problem is taken to a level further by the introduction of the concept “tragedy of the commons.” If resources are available to public for free and are unmanaged, Hardin claims that “it takes only one less than everyone to ruin a system of voluntary restraint.” Hardin reinforces the lifeboat model by presenting the “tragedy of the commons,” and makes his stance on issues of immigration and the world food bank. The world food bank was originally established so that nations in emergency could draw from the food reserve. However, the food reserve will deteriorate the situation of these countries in dire need, because it will eventually turn into a cycle of population reproduction through the ratchet effect. The food reserve will be a one-way transfer where rich nations will contribute and poor countries will extract. Although we might save lives in the short run, in the long run the
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
poor countries will not be able to restrain their population thus resulting in catastrophe. Lastly, Hardin takes a stance on immigration, saying that immigration will only diminish
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/08/2008 for the course PHIL 122 taught by Professor Gotlib during the Fall '07 term at Binghamton University.

Page1 / 5

phil122 final project - 2nd Project: Singer and Hardin on...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online