DB2- Attestation Update - A&A for CPAs

U nified global only to the extent that any country

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: hat part of the standards. U nified? Global? Only to the extent that any country can opt out of anyt hi ng they don’t like. On to some of the arguments in favor of, and opposed to, adoption of IFRS . Read the article for the full comments from which I will editorialize. IFRS are supposed to improve transparency of financial reporting around the world in order to lower capital costs. The professor points out these benefits are overstated for U S companies because it is unlikely that financial reporting practices by U .S . firms will improve significantly as a result of1/4 http://attestationupdate.com/2011/06/28/ar g uments- for - adopting - ifr s- ar e- weak- ar g uments- ag ainst- have- validity- ther efor e- we- obviously- should- adopt- ifr s/ 1/23/2014 Ar g uments for adopting IFRS ar e weak, ar g uments ag ainst have validity. Ther efor e we obviously should adopt IFRS. | Attestation Update - A&A for CPAs it is unlikely that financial reporting practices by U .S . firms will improve significantly as a result of IFRS adoption S ounds quite reasonable to me! Benefits of cross-border comparabilities are exaggerated, according to the professor, because IFRS will do absolutely nothing about other factors that will affect reporting such as countries’ legal institutions, their capital markets, firms’ business and governance practices, and managers’ personal motives Those factors will continue to create divergence in reporting, regardless...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online