The answer lies in the ability of fis to better

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: swer lies in the ability of FIs to better resolve the three costs facing a saver who chooses to invest directly in corporate securities. Information Costs Agency Costs Costs relating to the risk that the owners and managers of firms that receive savers’ funds will take actions with those funds contrary to the best interests of the savers. Delegated Monitor An economic agent appointed to act on behalf of smaller agents in collecting information and/or investing funds on their behalf. One problem faced by an average saver directly investing in a commercial firm’s financial claims is the high cost of information collection. Household savers must monitor the actions of firms in a timely and complete fashion after purchasing securities. Failure to monitor exposes investors to agency costs, that is, the risk that the firm’s owners or managers will take actions with the saver’s money contrary to the promises contained in the covenants of its securities contracts. Monitoring costs are part of overall agency costs...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 03/09/2014 for the course ACC 301 at HELP University.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online