How Do Children Acquire Number Concepts ECI 314 Early Childhood Mathematics

The three levels found level 1 at level 1 the child

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: the initial equality: “But remem­ ber how you put a red counter in front of each blue one before? An­ other child said there are just as many red ones as blue ones now be­ cause all I did was move them. Who do you think is right, you or the other child?” The Three Levels Found Level 1. At Level 1, the child cannot make a set that has the same number. Some children put out all the red counters as shown in Figure 1.2a. They stop putting counters out only because there are no more left. Figure 1.2b shows a more advanced response within Level 1. The chil­ dren who do this do not put out the same number of red counters as blue ones but carefully use the spatial frontiers of the rows as the cri­ terion for deciding the “sameness” of the two quantities. (When chil­ dren have not yet built the logic of number, they use the best crite­ rion they can think of to judge the quantitative “sameness.” In this case, the criterion is the spatial frontiers, which they can see.) Level 2. At Level 2 children can make a set that has the same number by using one-to-one correspondence, but they cannot conserve this equal­ ity. When asked the conservation question, they reply, for example, “There are more red ones because the red line is longer.” Level 3. At Level 3 children are conservers. They give correct answers to all the questions, are not swayed by countersuggestions, and give one of the following three arguments to explain why they think the two rows have the same quantity: • “There’s just as many blue ones as red ones because you didn’t add anything or take anything away” (the identity argument). • “We could put all the red ones back to the way they were before, and you’ll see that there’s the same number” (the reversibility argument). Theoretical Foundation 8 Figure 1.2. Two sublevels within Level 1. • “The red row is longer, but there’s more space in between. So the number is still the same” (the compensation argument). Intermediate level. Conservation is not achieved overnight, and there is an intermediate level between Levels 2 and 3. Intermediate-level chil­ dren hesitate and/or keep changing their minds (“There are more blue ones . . . , no, red ones . . . , no, they’re the same_ ”). When children _ give the correct answer but cannot justify it, they are also categorized at the intermediate level. The conservation task is a test of children’s logico-mathematical knowledge. Counters are cultural objects (social knowledge), and knowing that counters stay on the table without melting like ice cubes is physical knowledge. However, physical knowledge is not enough to deduce that the quantity in the two rows stays the same when their empirical appearance changes. Only when children can make numerical relationships among the chips can they deduce, with the force of logical necessity, that the two rows have the same number. This state­ ment will be clarified by the following discussion of two lands of abstraction Piaget distinguished. How Do Children Acquire Number Concepts? 9 Empirical and Constructive Abstraction In empirical abstraction, we focus on a certain property of the object and ignore the others. For example, when we abstract the color of an object, we sim­ ply ignore the other properties such as weight and the material with which the object is made (plastic or glass, for instance). Constructive abstraction involves making mental relationships between and among objects, such as “the same,” “similar,” “different,” and “two.” As stated earlier, these relationships do not have an existence in external reality. The simi­ larity or difference between one counter and another is constructed, or men­ tally made, by each individual by constructive abstraction. Constructive abstraction is also known as “reflective” or “reflecting” abstrac­ tion. The French term Piaget usually used was abstractio...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online