problem set3 solution

# Hint start by decomposing the third lottery into a

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: by decomposing the third lottery into a combination of the first two. That is, if the first lottery is denoted A, the second B, and the third C, find [ ] such that ( ) violates the independence ( ) . Then show that axiom.] } denote the activities “going out” “watching TV” and “working” Let { respectively. The options faced by Jill are three lotteries over the three activities: [ [ [ We know that . Consider and . The independence axiom says that if we mixed these two lotteries with a third one, , in the same proportion, the preference over the mixture would [ ], stay the same; that is, for ( ) ( ) Let and . Then, [ [ But this contradicts that fact that independence axiom. [ [ [ Therefore Jill’s preference violates the b) Since Jill’s preferences violate the independence axiom, we know that they do not admit an expected utility representation. Show directly that it is impossible to assign utilities to the outcomes so that the ranking of the expected utilities of the three lotteries matches Jill’s preference ranking. [Hint: To do t...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online