Least two evaluations with a classical apparatus

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: mprovement by Cleve et al. least two evaluations. with a classical apparatus, which would require atto Deutsch’s 1985 algorithm (Nielsen & Chuang, 2010, p. 59). This example highlights the difference between quantum parallelism and classical randomized algorithms. Naively, one might think that the state |0i|f (0)i + |1i|f (1)i corresponds rather closely to a probabilistic classical computer that evaluates f (0) with probability one-half, or f (1) with probability one-half. The difference is that in a classical computer these two alternatives forever exclude one another; in a quantum computer it is D. QUANTUM ALGORITHMS 133 ¶5. Superposition: Transform it to a pair of superpositions | 1i 1 1 = p ( | 0i + |1i ) ⌦ p ( | 0i 2 2 | 1i ) = | + by two tensored Hadamard gates. 1 Recall H |0i = p2 (|0i + |1i) = |+i and H |1i = ¶6. Function application: Next apply Uf to | ¶7. Note Uf |xi|0i = |xi|0 1 p ( | 0i 2 1i =|+ i. (III.21) | 1i ) = | i . i. f ( x) i = | xi | f ( x) i . ¶8. Also note Uf |xi|1i...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 03/14/2014 for the course COSC 494/594 at University of Tennessee.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online