As mentioned earlier coarsening beyond the original

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ond the original mesh is not allowed. The process is complex. It must be done without introducing irregular nodes. Suppose, for example, that the quartet of small elements (shown with dashed lines) in the center of the mesh of Figure 8.2.8 were scheduled for removal. Their direct removal would create three irregular nodes on the edges of the parent triangle. Thus, we would have to determine if removal of the elements containing these irregular nodes is justi ed based on error-indication information. If so, the mesh would be coarsened to the one shown in Figure 8.2.11. Notice that the coarsened mesh of Figure 8.2.11 di ers from mesh of Figure 8.2.7 that was re ned to create the mesh of Figure 8.2.8. Hence, re nement and coarsening may not be reversible operations because of their independent treatment of irregular nodes. Coarsening may be done without a tree structure. Shephard et al. 38] describe an \edge collapsing" procedure where the vertex at one end of an element edge is \collapsed" onto the one at the other end. Ai a 2] describes a two-dimensional variant of this procedure which we reproduce here. Let P be the polygonal region composed of the union of elements sharing Vertex V0 (Figure 8.2.12). Let V1 V2 : : : Vk denote the vertices on the k triangles containing V0 and suppose that error indicators reveal that these elements may 10 Adaptive Finite Element Techniques Figure 8.2.11: Coarsening of a quartet of elements shown with dashed lines in Figure 8.2.8 and the removal of surrounding elements to avoid irregular nodes. V4 V4 V3 V3 V0 V2 V5 V2 V5 V1 V1 Figure 8.2.12: Coarsening of a polygonal region (left) by collapsing Vertex V0 onto V1 (right). be coarsened. The strategy of collapsing V0 onto one of the vertices Vj , j = 1 2 : : : k, is done by deleting all edges connected to V0 and then re-triangulating P by connecting Vj to the other vertices of P (cf. the right of Figure 8.2.12). Vertex V0 is called the collapsed vertex and Vj is called the target vertex. Collapsing has to be evaluated for topological compatibility and geometric validity before it is performed. Checking for geometric validity prevents situations like the one shown in Figure 8.2.13 from happening. A collapse is topologically incompatible when, e.g., V0 is on @ and the target vertex Vj is within . Assuming that V0 can be collapsed, the target vertex is chosen to be the one that maximizes the minimum angle of the resulting re-triangulation of P . Ai a 2] does no collapsing when the smallest angle that would be produced by collapsing is smaller than a prescribed minimum angle. This might result in a mesh that is ner than needed for the speci ed accuracy. In this case, the minimum angle restriction could be waived when V0 has been scheduled for coarsening more than a prescribed number of times. Suppose that the edges h1e h2e h3e of an 8.2. h-Re nement 11 element e are indexed such that h1e e may be calculated as h2e h3e, then the smallest angle sin 1e where Ae is the area of Element e. of Element = h2Ae h 2e 3e V4 V4 V5 1e V5 V0...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online