This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: tually improves slightly to p t=h2 1=2.
Let us now turn to a more general examination of stability and convergence. Let's
again focus on our model problem: determine u 2 H01 satisfying
If (v ut) + A(v u) = (v f )
(v u) = (v u0) 8v 2 H01
8v 2 H01 t>0
t = 0: (9.4.9b) N
The semidiscrete approximation consists of determining U 2 S0 (V Ut ) + A(V U ) = (V f ) 8V 2 S0N (9.4.9a) H01 such that t>0 (9.4.10a) 9.4. Convergence and Stability 23 (V U ) = (V u0) 8V 2 S0N t = 0: (9.4.10b) Trivial Dirichlet boundary data, again, simpli es the analysis.
Our rst result establishes the absolute stability of the nite element solution of the
semidiscrete problem (9.4.10) in the L2 norm. Theorem 9.4.1. Let 2 S0N satisfy
8V 2 S0N (V t ) + A(V ) = 0
(V ) = (V 0 ) 8V 2 S0N t>0
t = 0: (9.4.11a)
(9.4.11b) Then k ( t)k0 k 0k0 t > 0: (9.4.11c) Remark 1. With (x t) being the di erence between two solutions of (9.4.10a) satisfying initial conditions that di er by 0 (x), the loading (V f ) vanishes upon subtraction
(as with (9.4.2)).
Proof. Replace V in (9.4.11a) by to obtain (
or
Integrating t ) + A( ) = 0 1 d k k2 + A( ) = 0:
2 dt 0 k ( t)k = k ( 0)k ; 2
2
0 2
0 Zt
0 A( )d : The result (9.4.11c) follows by using the initial data (9.4.11b) and the nonnegativity of
A( ).
We've discussed stability at some length, so now let us turn to the concept of convergence. Convergence analyses for semidiscrete Galerkin approximations parallels the lines
of those for elliptic systems. Let us, as an example, establish convergence for piecewiselinear solutions of (9.4.10) to solutions of (9.4.9). Theorem 9.4.2. Let S0N consist of continuous piecewiselinear polynomials on a family of uniform meshes h characterized by their maximum element size h. Then there exists
a constant C > 0 such that max ku ; U k0
t2(0 T ] T
C (1 + j log h2 j)h2 tmax] kuk2:
2(0 T (9.4.12) 24 Parabolic Problems N
Proof. Create the auxiliary problem: determine W 2 S0 such that ;(V W ( )) + A(V W ( 8V 2 S0N )) = 0 2 (0 t) ~
W (x y t) = E (x y t) = U (x y t) ; U (x y t) (9.4.13a)
(9.4.13b) ~N
where U 2 S0 satis es A(V u( ~
) ; U( )) = 0 8V 2 S0N We see that W satis es a terminal value problem on 0
elliptic problem with as a parameter.
Consider the identity 2 (0 T ]: (9.4.13c) ~
t ant that U satis es an d (W E ) = (W E ) + (W E ):
d Integrate and use (9.4.13b) kE ( t)k = (W E ( 0)) +
2
0 Use (9.4.13a) with V replaced by E kE ( t)k = (W E ( 0)) +
2
0 Zt
0 Zt
0 (W E ) + (W E )]d : A(W E ) + (W E )]d : (9.4.14) Setting v in (9.4.9) and V in (9.4.10) to W and subtracting yields
(W u ; U ) + A(W u ; U ) = 0 >0 (W u ; U )(0) = 0
= 0:
Add these results to (9.4.14) and use (9.4.13b) to obtain kE ( t)k = (W ( 0)) +
2
0 Zt
0 A(W ) + (W )]d where ~
= u ; U:
The rst term in the integrand vanishes by virtue of (9.4.13c). The second term is
integrated by parts to obtain Zt kE ( t)k = (W ( t)) ; (W )d :
2
0 0 (9.4.15a) 9.4. Convergence and Stability 25 This result can be simpli ed slightly by use of Cauchy's inequality (j(W V )...
View Full
Document
 Spring '14
 JosephE.Flaherty
 The Land

Click to edit the document details