Eco 204 s ajaz hussain do not distribute 32 write down

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: a 1% excise tax on good 1? Show all calculations. Answer Notice that: Is a log positive monotonic transformation of the Cobb-Douglas utility function The “log Cobb-Douglas” UMP is: ⏟ To solve this problem we’d need the Lagrangian function: [ We are told and and are asked for the impact on optimal utility due to a 1% excise on good 1. First, let’s use the envelope theorem to see the impact on due to 1% excise on good 1 (review the three steps of the envelope theorem): ❶ Express the objective function in terms of parameters: [ ❷ To get change in objective with respect to the parameter differentiate with respect to the parameter that is changing: here it is (since the excise tax is on good 1): ❸ To get change in the optimal objective evaluate the derivative in ❷ at the optimal solution: 12 ECO 204 Chapter 3: Practice Problems & Solutions for Utility Maximization in ECO 204 (this version 2012-2013) University of Toronto, Department of Economics (STG). ECO 204, S. Ajaz Hussain. Do not distribute. ( )( ) Now, at the optimum (why?): [⏟ ⏟ Therefore: Therefore: Thus: We are told there has been a 1% excise tax on good 1. Thus ( Change in price of good 1 = () and so: ) (b) Without solving the UMP, what is impact on the consumer’s utility due to a 1% excise tax on good 2? Show all calculations. The “log Cobb-Douglas” UMP is: ⏟ To solve this problem we’d need the Lagrangian function: [ We are told and and are asked for the impact on optimal utility due to a 1% excise on good 2. First, let’s use the envelope theorem to see the impact on due to 1% excise on good 2 (review the three steps of the envelope theorem): ❶ Express the objective function in terms of parameters: [ 13 ECO 204 Chapter 3: Practice Problems & Solutions for Utility Maximization in ECO 204 (this version 2012-2013) University of Toronto, Department of Economics (STG). ECO 204, S. Ajaz Hussain. Do not distribute. ❷ To get change in objective with respect to the parameter differentiate with respect to the parameter that is changing: here it is (since the excise tax is on good 2): ❸ To get change in the optimal objective evaluate the derivative in ❷ at the optimal solution: ( )( ) Now, at the optimum (why?): [⏟ ⏟ Therefore: Therefore: Thus: We are told there has been a 1% excise tax on good 2. Thus ( Change in price of good 2 = () and so: ) (3.6) A consumer’s preferences are representable by the following utility function over goods 1 and 2 (defined over the { }): consumption set √( ) Does this consumer have rational preferences? A one or two sentence answer suffices. Answer Yes. In ECO 204, we assumed that if a consumer has rational preferences then her preferences can be represented by a utility function. 14 ECO 204 Chapter 3: Practice Problems & Solutions for Utility Maximization in ECO 204 (this version 2012-2013) University of Toronto, Department of Economics (STG). ECO 204, S. Ajaz Hussain. Do not distribute. (3.7) The following utility functions are given to model automobile consumers’ preferences over cubic feet of interior s...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online