This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: ptimal cost in terms of parameters as
.
Now, if we substitute
into the Lagrangian equation we get the optimal value of the Lagrangian
equation, the “optimized objective of the constrained optimization problem”, where some terms are going to be zero:
[⏟ [⏟ ( [ ) { ⏟
} This allows us to establish a few general results about the cost of producing a target output in the short run. Suppose
that after we solve this CMP some parameter were to change slightly. Very likely, this’ll lead to new values for the
optimal amount of the variable input and therefore a new value for the optimal cost. Without solving the problem again,
we can use the envelope theorem to compute the (approximate) change in the optimal cost due to a small change in a
parameter. Following the three steps of the envelope theorem we would first write down what we are trying to
maximize in terms of parameters. In the case of a one variable and one fixed input CMP this would be (here, the variable
input has a lower limit of zero in general could have a nonzero minimum limit):
[ [ ( [ ( [ ) ) ( ⏟ ⏟ ⏟ ) [ ( ⏟ ) ⏟
[ Next, we would differentiate the parameterized Lagrangian with respect to the parameter that is changing and then
evaluate that derivative at the optimal solution to get the change in the optimal Lagrangian due to the change in the
parameter. For example, here are the expressions for the change in the optimal Lagrangian due to, all else constant, a
changes in the parameters
,
respectively: 6
ECO 204 Chapter 13: The Short Run Cost Minimization Problem (this version 20122013) University of Toronto, Department of Economics (STG). ECO 204, S. Ajaz Hussain. Do not distribute. But since
solution): { } these derivatives are in fact (after taking account of the change in the optimal
( ) That is, if the price of the variable input rises, total cost must increase by the amount of the initial optimal variable input,
or stays the same (why?). This is illustrated below:
Fixed
Input Initial isocost line New isocost line Fixed
Input Target Output
0 Variable
Input ( ) That is, if the price of the fixed input rises, total cost must increase by the amount of the initial optimal fixed input, or
stays the same (why?). This is illustrated below: 7
ECO 204 Chapter 13: The Short Run Cost Minimization Problem (this version 20122013) University of Toronto, Department of Economics (STG). ECO 204, S. Ajaz Hussain. Do not distribute.
Fixed
Input Initial isocost line New isocost line Fixed
Input Target Output
0 Variable
Input ( ) That is, if the company uses another unit of the fixed input, then total cost must increase by the price of the fixed input
(but cost can’t stay the same). This is illustrated below.
Fixed
Input Target Output Initial isocost line New isocost line New
Fixed
Input 1
0 Initial
Fixed
Input Variable
Input (
A priori, we don’t know the sign of ) ; we know that since . However, one can argue that in fact by noting that is attached to an equality constraint that in theory
Marginal cost, which cannot be negative (think about it). If
is alway...
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 03/20/2014 for the course ECON 204 taught by Professor Ajazhussain during the Fall '09 term at University of Toronto Toronto.
 Fall '09
 AJAZHUSSAIN
 Economics, Microeconomics

Click to edit the document details