{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Peng Yao Notes Chapter 2,3

Conservative vs creative conserve custom and

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: inevitably the consequences of objective strat thinking- • Subjective- from exper and data of ones mind- avoid it- 2. Divided into slosed and open strat thinking models • Closed- experience and traditions- makes few exchanges from the outside world- • Open- exchange info with outside world- sub old thinking with new- collect info from all sides- breaks narrowness of thinkgin- 3. Strat thinking can be stategem vs force types strat thinking models • Stratagem type—traditional chinese- useo limited force to achieve victory –‘bes tot attack enemy strategy’- chinas’ tradit thinking- subdue the enmy without fighting- virtue in fighting and righteous war • Force type- winning by strencth- western- direct confrontation- modern americanmore focus on ratio of force to weapons- before Vietnam, all about attrition- now, a little diff- 4. Conservative vs creative • Conserve- custom and tradition as reference- basis is that there is similarity between things- based on similarity of two things- past may help solve probs- but can lead to limitations- many exs of defeat when relying experience of last war- France in WWII- obsessed ith defense position like in WWI- had passive defense policy and placed at security on the Maginot line- but defeated in 1.5 months • Creatie- unorthodox- find optimum option ot solve probs with new visio...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}