Strategy in Asia

Science as relational kantian idea cannot determine

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ao- best book on strategy- integration of all major writings on strategy- Science- brit definition is cause and effect – develop hypothesis about relationship and then try to determine the falsehoods of it- science has no truth, but rather a lot of falsity- cant prove anything, but can disprove a lot - science as relational- Kantian idea- cannot determine causality, but objectivity was to map the key elements and relationship between them- Eastern has same approach- different styles of playing as well as empirical nature- Chinese deconstruct nature of competition, get key makeup- some of it quantitative Not rejecting empiricism, just saying it’s one part Peng and yao- explain how levels developed in E and W levels of analysis problem- war system- having nuclear technology – war system because anarchic system, no centralized authority, so, all semi- soveriegn people doing things randomly- group of people using assets of state to inflict will upon oth...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 03/20/2014 for the course STIA 396 at Georgetown.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online