{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Murray Millet Chapter 1

Responsibilitie d rift between general staff at top

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: about op or tactical lessons of war • But, did accomplish stuff- armore warfare- contributed a lot to the creation of panzer forces in Germany- • • • • • • • Fuller and Hart acigs, experimented with armored warfare- turned theory into reality- ttacked the milit leaders- therefore, their influence decreased- so, ideas influenced less the prep of gorund forces and prevented help ven after german wins of 39- 40 When Milne was 27/28 potentials of armored warfare- underlined tactival adv of manurever and firepower- imp of radios for armored formations=- but, dutring pracgice, armored was not living up to it’s full idealization- Hart was pissed But, hart didn’t understand that Burnett- Stuart wasn’t trying to show off, but rather test troops under unfavorable conditions- so, unfortunate for the political impact- Armored develop in 30s was missed opportunity- tied develop only to infantry and cavalry- Not even prepared intellectually- thought a G advance thorugh Holland and Belgium would be slower than before- Paid heaviest price in locust years- was the inability to adapt to battlefield in later ueard=s- bc didn’t want innovators of armored warfare to have power During Milne’s CIGS, he got little help form armored innovators bc those innovators had exacerbated the gap F...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}