Murray Millet Chapter 1

Treaty discredited tradit g leadership so sch totally

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: rench • Administrative- misassigned, misdirected orgs= structure= paralysis of indecision – general staff commanded the army, but had no control over finances, personnel or administration- sec general ran the administration, but had no command responsibilitie- d • Rift between general staff at top and those in charge of regimental soldiering- • Took prep for gorund war seriously- but, doctrine fell victim to org vacuum- no large scale exam of the lessons by a huge portion of the officer corps • French War college- emph tight control over maneuever- tighltly controlled op, artillery would dominate battlefield and movement forwar- only go overto offensive if favorabl- but, doctrine made F incapable of undertaing G doctrine it also gave them overconfidence in the ability of their firepower to contrain enemy attacks • Did put effort into tanks- 40- more tansk than G- but, since armored develop occurred within a doctinral straitjacket that aimed at max control over ope, the F failed ot see the tanks potential- just saw them as supporting the methodical battle- • Slow progress in creating an armored force- but, some talk about making an armored division like cavalry- shock force to rupture enem’s front- swift and far reaching action- but, doctrinal framework and indeiciosn kept de...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 03/20/2014 for the course STIA 396 at Georgetown.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online