Due to this there is no further credit risk provision

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: : NOK in millions 2011 2010 Fair value as of 31 december liabilities liabilities Net investment hedge instruments (22 522) (20 845) Exchange rate risk sensitivity analysis This analysis does not take into account correlation between currencies other than NOK. Empirical studies confirm substantial diversification effect across the currencies that the Group is exposed to. Effects on net currency gains (losses) The Group is exposed to currency fluctuations on monetary items in the statement of financial position, denominated in other currencies than the functional currency. As of 31 December 2011, if the relevant functional currencies had weakened / strengthened by 10 % against the currencies in which these items are denominated, with all other variables held constant, net income for the Group for the year would have been NOK 1,193 million higher / lower (NOK 950 million for 2010). This is mainly a result of foreign exchange translation of EuR, SEK, DKK, SGD and uSD denominated trade payables, receivables and debt in subsidiaries. As of 31 December 2011, if the Norwegian Krone had weakened / strengthened by 10%, with all other variables held constant, the currency effects of translating the Group’s foreign debt to the functional currency would be NOK 3,392 million lower / higher of which NOK 2,252 million would impact other comprehensive income as the debt is part of net investment hedges. /page 68/ telenor annual report 2011 notes to the financial statements / telenor group Effects due to foreign exchange translations on other comprehensive income Translation of subsidiaries from their functional currencies into the presentation currency of the Group (NOK) will impact the Group’s other comprehensive income and equity. If local currency had weakened/strengthened by 10% against the presentation currency of the Group (NOK), the increase/decrease in the carrying amount of equity as of 31 December 2011 would have been approximately NOK 6.4 billion (NOK 7.5 billion as of 31 December 2010). Effects due to foreign exchange translations on net income Translation of net income from subsidiaries with functional currency other than NOK, also represents a currency exposure for the Group. The sensitivity analysis is only carried out for the Group’s major subsidiaries. If local currency had weakened / strengthened by 10% against all other currencies included in the analysis, net income for the Group would have been NOK 358 million lower / higher in 2011 (NOK 552 million in 2010). Credit risk Credit risk is the loss that the Group would suffer if a counterparty fails to perform its financial obligations. Except for equity instruments, the Group considers its maximum exposure to credit risk to be as follows: Maximum credit exposure NOK in millions Cash and cash equivalents bonds and commercial papers > 3 months (note 23) Financial derivatives (note 23) Trade and other current financial receivables (note 22) 2011 2010 12 899 2 292 1 942 13 738 13 606 659 2 009 13 694 Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited due to the Group’s customer base containing a high number of customers that are also considered unrelated. Due to this, there is no further credit risk provision required in excess of the normal provision for bad and doubtful receivables. See note 22 for information on receivables in terms of age distribution and provision for bad debt. The Group invests surplus liquidity in current interest-bearing assets. Credit risk is inherent in such instruments. Financial derivatives with positive replacement value for the Group, taking into account legal netting agreements, also represents a credit risk. Credit risk arising from financial transactions is managed through diversification, only accepting counterparties with high credit rating and defining aggregate credit exposure limits for each counterparty. Telenor ASA has legal netting agreements (ISDA Master Agreements) with 11 banks which allow gains to be offset against losses in the event of default or bankruptcy. As of 31 December 2011, Telenor ASA had collateral agreements with four banks. Both the ISDA Master Agreements and collateral agreements are means to reduce overall credit risk. Counterparty risk in subsidiaries in emerging markets is higher due to lack of counterparties with high credit rating. This counterparty risk is monitored on a regular basis. Fair value of derivatives with positive replacement value for the Group was NOK 1.4 billion as of 31 December 2011, taking into account legal netting agreements (NOK 1.7 billion as of 31 December 2010). The Group’s cash and cash equivalents do also represent a credit risk. The Group normally has deposits in countries with major operations. The credit risk on such deposits varies dependent on the credit worthiness of the individual banks and countries in which the banks are located. See note 24 for information regarding cash inside and outside the cash pool. Credit risk exposure for the Group is monitored on a daily basis. Other market risk Telenor ha...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 03/21/2014.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online