I4 12 03 04 00 18 dl 01 a a 05 06 06 20 07 07 06 08

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: .05 .06 .06 .20 -.07 -.07 .06 ;08 .12 .10 Al -.07 -.09 -.09 k&l -.16 -.09 .23 38 .43 .05 -.14 .05 & 34 .36 .28 -.14 .10 -.05 .04 -.02 .01 & I .24 .13 .oo .01 -.13 -.22 -.w .33 .36 A2 .16 .07 -.24 .03 4Q 9 -.20 -.04 -40 b9l -10 -.33 .01 -.06 -.41 -.14 35 .07 -.OQ -.31 -.09 -.OB a -.17 .09 3.1 7 11.2 18.7 2.68 15.8 a C. Market Potential 1. Acceptability o leasing as a f financial t d 2. Market potential 3. Growth potential 4. Attitude of government toward -leasingIndustry foreign firms D. investment Risk 1. Volatility 2. Risk of converting/repatriating income 3. Risk of asset expropriation E. Contractual Risk 1. Cost of making and enforcing contracts 2. Maintenance of quality standards 3. Risk of dissipation of knowledge Eigenvalue % variance explained 38 -.18 3.30 19.4 .oo z ! 1.90 .o o 1.45 8.. . .6 assessed by estimating coefficiental'pha and dropping items with low itemto-total correlations. Finally, the reduced set of items was rechecked for internal consistency via factor analysis, conf...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 03/22/2014.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online