Concern for thes e values is inherent in any rules

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: n any rules -bas ed s ys tem of co-operation, s ince without thes e values rules would be m eaningles s in the firs t place. Rules , therefore, create their own incentive for fulfilm ent. The m om entum of legal developm ent has occurred in other ins titutions bes ides the GATT, m os t notably in the European Union (EU). Over the pas t two decades the European Court of Jus tice (ECJ) has cons is tently rendered decis ions that have expanded increm entally the EU's internal m arket, in which the doctrine of 'm utual recognition' handed down in the cas e Cas s is de Dijon in 1979 was a key turning point. The Court is now widely recognis ed as a m ajor player in European integration, even though arguably s uch a s trong role was not originally envis aged in the Treaty of Rom e, which initiated the current European Union. One m eans the Court us ed to expand integration was the 'teleological m ethod of interpretation', whereby the actions of m em ber s tates were evaluated agains t 'the accom plis hm ent of the m os t elem entary com m unity goals s et forth in the Pream ble to the [Rom e] treaty'. The teleological m ethod repres ents an effort to keep current policies cons is tent with s tated goals , and it is analogous to the effort in GATT to keep contracting party trade practices cons is tent with s tated rules . In both cas es legal concerns and procedures are an independent force for further cooperation. In large part the WTO was an exercis e in cons olidation. In the context of a trade negotiation that created a nearrevolutionary expans ion of international trade rules , the form ation of the WTO was a deeply cons ervative act needed to ens ure that the benefits of the new rules would not be los t. The WTO was all about ins titutional s tructure and dis pute s ettlem ent: thes e are the concerns of cons ervatives and not revolutionaries , which is why lawyers and legalis ts took the lead on thes e is s ues . The WTO codified the GATT ins titutional practice that had developed by cus tom over three decades , and it incorporated a new dis pute s ettlem ent s ys tem that was neces s ary to keep both old and new rules from becom ing a s ham . Both the international s tructure and the dis pute s ettlem ent s ys tem were neces s ary to pres erve and enhance the integrity of the m ultilateral trade regim e that had been built increm entally from the 1940s to the 1990s . 24. What could be the clos es t reas on why the WTO was not form ed in the 1970s ? a . Th e US g o ve rn me n t d id n o t like it. b .Imp o rta n t p la ye rs d id n o t fin d it in th e ir b e s t in te re s t to d o s o . c. La w ye rs d id n o t w o rk fo r th e d is p u te s e ttle me n t s ys te m. d . Th e To kyo Ro u n d n e g o tia tio n w a s a n a tte mp t a t co n s titu tio n a l re fo rm. e .No t Atte mp te d 25. The m os t likely reas on for the acceptance of the WTO package by nations was that a . it h a d th e me a n s to p re ve n t th e US fro m ta kin g u n ila te ra l me a s u re s . b . th e y re co g n iz e d th e n e e d...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online