This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: wayside—does not permit us to
understand the being of the black man [sic]” (Black Skin, White Masks 110). In sharp contrast to the late 60s and early 70s, we now live in a
political, academic, and cinematic milieu which stresses “diversity,” “unity,” “civic participation,” “hybridity,”
“access,” and “contribution.” The radical fringe of political discourse amounts to little more than a passionate
dream of civic reform and social stability. The distance between the protester and the police has narrowed
considerably. The effect of this upon the academy is that intellectual protocols tend to privilege two of the three
domains of subjectivity, namely preconscious interests (as evidenced in the work of social science around “political unity,” “social attitudes,”
“civic participation,” and “diversity,”) and unconscious identification (as evidenced in the humanities’ postmodern regimes of “diversity,” “hybridity,” and
“relative [rather than “master”] narratives”). Since the 1980s, intellectual...
View Full Document
- Spring '14