This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: ut not in service of a higher unity" (Fanon, 1968: 38-39). This is the basis of his later
assertion that the two zones produce two different "species," between which "no conciliation is possible"
(Ibid.). The phrase "not in service of a higher unity" dismisses any kind of dialectical optimism for a
future synthesis. In "The Avant-Garde of White Supremacy," Martinot and Sexton assert the primacy of
Fanon's Manichean zones (without the promise of higher unity), even in the face of American integration
facticity. Fanon's specific colonial context does not share Martinot and Sexton's historical or national
context. Common to both texts, however, is the settler/native dynamic, the differential zoning, and the gratuity (as opposed to the contingency) of violence
that accrues to the blackened position. The dichotomy between white ethics [the discourse of civil society]
and its irrelevance to the violence of police profiling is not dialectical; the two are incommensurable
whenever one attempts to speak about the paradigm of policing, one is forced back into a discussion of
particular events - high-profile homicides...
View Full Document
This document was uploaded on 03/26/2014.
- Spring '14