In effect all of these theories remain disguises for

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Frank, Gramsci’s Black Marx: Whither the Slave in Civil Society?”, Social Identities, Volume 9, Number 2, 2003, Accessed 8-4-12, MR) Students of struggle return, doggedly, to the Prison Notebooks for insights regarding how to bring about a revolution in a society in which state/capital formations are in some way protected by the ‘trenches’ of civil society. It is this outer perimeter, this discursive ‘trench’, constructed by an ensemble of private initiatives, activities, and an ensemble of pose-able questions (hegemony), which must be reconfigured before a revolution can take the form of a frontal assault. But this trench called civil society is not, for Gramsci, in and of itself the bane of the working class. Instead it represents a terrain to be occupied, assumed, and appropriated in a pedagogic project of transforming ‘common sense’ into ‘good sense’. This notion of ‘destruction-construction’ is a War of Position which involves agitating within civil society in a ‘revolutionary movement’ that builds ‘qualitatively new social relationships ’ (Sassoon, 1987, p. 15): [A War of Position] is a struggle that engages on a wide range of fronts in which the state as normally defined…is only one aspect. [For Gramsci a War...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 03/26/2014.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online