This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: based on a fusion of Marxism, feminism, postcolonialism and psychology . He uses a small number
of independent films to illustrate his theories. Charlene Regester has a more practical framework. She divides her book into nine chapters devoted
to individual female actors and then weaves her ideological concepts into these specific chapters. Both have a problem with clarity. Regester uses less complex language
than Wilderson, but still manages to be obtuse at times. Wilderson starts from a position of using ontology and grammar as his main tools, but manages to consistently
misuse or misappropriate terms like fungible or fungibility. Wilderson writes as an intelligent and challenging author, but is often frustrating. Although his language is complicated, his concepts are often oversimplified . He envisions every black person in film as a slave who
is suffering from irreparable alienation from any meaningful sense of cultural identity. He believes that filmmakers, including
black filmmakers, are v...
View Full Document
- Spring '14