Politicized identity k linkimpact affirming racial

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: nor pretends to¶ properly engage with black film. Furthermore, Wilderson separates the different¶ waves of black film theory and approaches them, only, in terms of how a most recent¶ one might challenge its precedent. Again, his approach is problematic because it ¶ does not mention or emphasise the inter‐ connectivity of/in black film theory. As a¶ case in point, Wilderson does not link Tommy Lott’s mobilisation of Third Cinema¶ for black film theory to Yearwood’s idea of African Diaspora. (64) Additionally, of¶ course, Wilderson seems unaware that Third Cinema itself has been fundamentally¶ questioned since Lott’s 1990s’ theory of black film was formulated. Yet another¶ consequence of ignoring the African Diaspora is that it exposes Wilderson’s corpus ¶ of films as unable to carry the weight of the transnational argument he attempts to¶ advance. Here, beyond the US‐ centricity or ‘social and political specificity of [his] ¶ filmography’, (95) I am talking about Wilderson’s choice of films. For example,¶ Antwone Fisher (dir. Denzel Washington, 2002) is attacked unfairly for failing to¶ acknowledge...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online