This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: the Slave estate’s destruction, to
manifest itself at the ethical core of cinematic discourse, when this dream is no longer a constituent element of
political discourse in the streets nor of intellectual discourse in the academy? The answer is “no” in the sense that,
as history has shown, what cannot be articulated as political discourse in the streets is doubly foreclosed upon in
screenplays and in scholarly prose; but “yes” in the sense that in even the most taciturn historical moments such as
ours, the grammar of Black and Red suffering breaks in on this foreclosure , albeit like the somatic compliance of hysterical
symptoms—it registers in both cinema and scholarship as symptoms of awareness of the structural antagonisms. Between
1967 and 1980, we could think cinematically and intellectually of Blackness and Redness as having the coherence of full-blown discourses. But from 1980 to the
present, Blackness and Redness manifests only in the rebar of cinematic and intellectual (political) discourse, that...
View Full Document
This document was uploaded on 03/26/2014.
- Spring '14