Sagepubcomcontent176534fullpdfhtml see grandma only

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: mbolic violence—as something imposed imperceptibly onto a powerless subject—is anathema to both Fanon's objectives and his method. Hence the moment of blockage or impasse—at which the racialized subject confronts her lack of saying that such a stifling understanding of "ontological resistance," and corresponding lack of access to reciprocity—represents merely the mid-point of Fanon's analysis. For Fanon, unlike the sociologist Bourdieu, diagnosis will not suffice, perhaps because the actual violence confronted by racialized and colonized subjects demands more than the diagnosis of the abstract and universal functions of domination. Fanon's sociogenic method —which sees social structures as generating psychological and other disorders—entails more than just the epistemological element of sociology.28 While Fanon himself would only fully reach this conclusion some years later, sociogeny also entails interventionist praxis best summarized—and performed—in Fanon's 1956 letter of resignation from the Blida-Joinville Psychiatric Hospital in Algeria:The social structure existing in Algeria was hostile to any attempt [through psychiatry] to put the individual back...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online