DALY weights

Countries to a first order approximation you can see

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: momentum in 1990s and 2000s? According to which indicators and based on what kind of data? Explaining priority (historical analysis): Which factors contributed to the waxing and waning of CDD’s priority on the global health policy agenda Manipulating priority (political analysis): What can we do to get CDD back on the agenda and save more child lives? Look at framework for analysis slide CDD: Multiple Measures of Priority: Indicators of perception: expert opinion Outcome indicators: motality due to CDD Input indicators: Trends in treatment coverage Changes in financing Changes in staffing Bibliographic trends. Perception Indicator: We asked current and former CDD experts to assess priority on a scale of 1- 10 where 10 was defined as CDD’s priority in 1985 Diarrheal diseases as most important issue Experts estimated the priority of CDD in 2008 as 3 This is notable in the amount of data sources at each period (1990, 276 DD surveys from 60 countries and in 2008, regression model calculation) Forsberg graph: global trend But it’s not all positive and can’t measure in a global trend because some countries have regressed a lot (Kenya, Nigeria) but some have improved greatly (mali, Colombia) Not enough global data to say what has happened in the 2000s Measures of institution (WHO workers) Bibliographic trends:...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 04/01/2014.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online